Positive niche construction is a strengths-based approach to educating students with disabilities.
Reimagining Inclusion with Positive Niche Construction
Niche Construction
In Nature: Helping to ensure the thriving of an organism by directly modifying the environment in such a way that it enhances that organism’s chances for survival.
In Culture: Helping to ensure the thriving of a child by directly modifying the environment in such a way that it enhances that child’s chances for success.
Neurodiversity in the Classroom
In his book, Neurodiversity in the Classroom, Thomas Armstrong argues that the concept of neurodiversity is a “concept whose time has come.” What he means by this is to re-imagine how special education is constructed in our education system. The idea Armstrong highlights in his book is called, “positive niche construction” (PNC). Armstrong proposes this idea as an alternative to the more classic idea of “least restrictive environment” (LRE).
Reimagining Inclusion with Positive Niche Construction
The fundamental point here is that changing one’s environment can be just as effective – and often far more effective – in aiding that navigation than simply looking inside the head for solutions, or trying to – often forcibly – alter behaviours.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
Most people utilise the degree of power they have in changing their environment to fit their cognitive style.
Most people utilise the degree of power they have in changing their environment to fit their cognitive style fairly regularly. For instance, depending on one’s cognitive preferences, mood, energy levels, or the task to be completed, on any given day of work one might choose to work alone in a very quiet room, or to work in a buzzing cafe. Indeed, some individuals will have a consistent bias towards one environment over another. People often design and customise their work environments to minimise distractions and anxieties and maximise efficiency and reduce cognitive load. Doing so can be viewed as a form of situated cognition (see, e.g., Kirsh, 1995). To claim that we can alter our environments to support healthy coping is nothing new.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
The fundamental point here is that changing one’s environment can be just as effective – and often far more effective – in aiding that navigation than simply looking inside the head for solutions, or trying to – often forcibly – alter behaviours.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
Another shortcoming of current approaches is that they have exclusively targeted the remedying of perceived shortcomings, rather than attempting to find ways to accentuate the strengths and talents of individuals with ASC (Sharmin et al., 2018). Rather shockingly, the review notes that not a single research paper they looked at had assessed the ways that technology could serve to accentuate some of the unique strengths of individuals with ASC.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
A person’s strengths are, essentially, paths of least resistance in terms of trajectories that effectively minimise uncertainty. By designing environments that only remedy shortcomings rather than greasing the grooves that allow for the application of a person’s natural talents we implicitly deny them a trajectory that visits their most naturally stable sets of attractor points.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
As mentioned earlier, having an environment that allows an individual to exist in a way whereby they can cope with free energy minimization more fluidly allows for an environment in which they can develop and learn more effectively.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
An agent can minimise its free energy by acting upon the world to make it more suited to its preferred states.
This tending towards a stable attracting point can be explained as the minimisation of free energy. An agent can minimise its free energy by acting upon the world to make it more suited to its preferred states. This process is called active inference, which involves selecting actions that are most likely to lead to preferred outcomes while minimising the cost or surprise associated with the interaction with the world. Active Inference is a framework that provides a first-principle account of how autonomous agents operate and persist in dynamic, non-stationary environments.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
Individuals with autism (as well as other dynamical systems) tend towards stable configurations of attracting points, which can be explained through the principle of minimising free energy. In this context, free energy refers to the difference between a system’s predicted state and its actual state. When the environment is perceived as uncertain or unpredictable, the measure of free energy increases, indicating a mismatch between the expected and actual states of the system. Scaling up to an agent’s behaviour, agents as open systems interact with the world to seek states that best suit the maintenance of their integrity by adjusting and attuning to their environments. Adaptive behaviour can be explained as Active Inference over action policies that are most likely to lead to preferred outcomes while minimising the cost or surprise associated with the sensory inputs. In the context of autism, an individual may actively seek out or avoid certain environments or situations in order to maintain a stable and predictable state that minimises their free energy. Individuals with autism tend to minimise free energy by seeking out stable and reliable attracting points in their environment. This involves an agent’s tendency to seek familiar states or patterns. This tendency leads to repetitive or rigid behaviours, fixated interests, and a preference for routines that provide a sense of stability in an otherwise uncertain world. Thus, seeking stable attractive points can be seen as a strategy for reducing free energy and increasing the predictability of the environment for individuals with autism.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
A person’s behaviour can therefore be understood as always attempting to minimise uncertainty (free energy) through a navigation between sets of attractor and repeller points, wherein the inability to navigate effectively results in phenomenological experiences of stress and discomfort. The attracting points in the system represent stable patterns offering comfort and familiarity.
PsyArXiv Preprints | Smart Environments for Diverse Cognitive Styles: the Case of Autism
Table of Contents
- Niche Construction and Biology
- Positive Niche Construction in the Classroom
- Niche Construction and Evolution
- Collaborative Niche Construction
- Niche Communities
- Caves, Campfires, and Watering Holes
- A Space of One’s Own
- The place itself helps us think.
- Constructionism, collaborative niche construction, bricolage, and toolbelt theory go great together.
- Further Reading
Niche Construction and Biology
In the field of biology, the term niche construction is used to describe an emerging phenomenon in the understanding of human evolution. Since the days of Darwin, scientists have emphasized the importance of natural selection in evolution-the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. In natural selection, the environment represents a static entity to which a species must either adapt or fail to adapt. In niche construction, however, the species acts directly upon the environment to change it, thereby creating more favorable conditions for its survival and the passing on of its genes. Scientists now say that niche construction may be every bit as important for survival as natural selection (Lewontin, 2010; Odling-Smee, Laland, & Feldman, 2003).
Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life
We see many examples of niche construction in nature: a beaver building a dam, bees creating a hive, a spider spinning a web, a bird building a nest. All of these creatures are changing their immediate environment in order to ensure their survival. Essentially, they’re creating their own version of a “least restrictive environment.” In this book, I present seven basic components of positive niche construction to help teachers differentiate instruction for students with special needs (2012).
Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life
Positive Niche Construction in the Classroom
Armstrong identifies the seven components of positive niche construction in the classroom as:
Seven Components of Positive Niche Construction
Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life
- Assessment of students’ strengths
- The use of assistive technology and Universal Design for Learning
- Enhanced human resources
- The implementation of strengths-based learning strategies
- Envisioning positive role models
- Activation of affirmative career aspirations
- The engineering of appropriate environmental modifications to support the development of neurodiverse students
When we embrace a strength-based paradigm grounded in differentiated instruction and positive niche construction, however, we embark upon a path that uses the widest range of student-centered interventions and builds upon each student’s core capacity of strengths.
Because neurodiversity is essentially an ecological perspective, I also develop the related concept of positive niche construction—that is, the establishment of a favorable environment within which a student with special needs can flourish in school. This concept, taken from the fields of biology and ecology, serves as a more positive and constructive way of talking about the federal mandate that students be placed in the “least restrictive environment.” Instead of spending all of our efforts in trying to make students with special needs more like “normal” students, I propose we devote more attention to accepting and celebrating their differences.
This strength-based approach can serve as a new way to enrich the field of differentiated instruction by ensuring that we develop teaching interventions that address what is unique and positive about each individual student.
In the neurodiversity model, there is no “normal” brain sitting in a vat somewhere at the Smithsonian or National Institutes of Health to which all other brains must be compared. Instead, there are a wide diversity of brains populating this world. The neurodiversity-inspired educator will have a deep respect for each child’s unique brain and seek to create the best differentiated learning environment within which it can thrive. This practice of differentiating instruction for the neurodiverse brain will be referred to in the course of this book as positive niche construction.
Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life
Niche Construction and Evolution
Once culture gets off the ground, it enables adaptation to new niches, situations, climates, and ecologies in a vastly more efficient way than can be achieved by ordinary natural selection. Societies with culture, and thus the individuals constituting them, can adapt quickly to changed circumstances of any kind, taking advantage of new opportunities and avoiding threats to their way of life, without waiting for the cumbersome process of natural selection to do its work.
Mixed Messages: Cultural and Genetic Inheritance in the Constitution of Human Society
Evolution by natural selection achieves fitness only through a very inefficient process that does not involve foresight, an ability to plan, an ability to remember and thereby learn from past experience, an ability to survey the environment and decide what changes are likely to prove beneficial and then put them into effect, or an ability to utilize feedback from the environment via conscious trial and error or other experimental methods-in short, an ability to set goals, recognize or invent what needs to be done to achieve them, and do it.
Put in this way, it seems obvious that an organism that was in fact able to do all these things in the course of its phenotypic life would be able to run evolutionary rings around almost any competitor that lacked such abilities. While I do not speculate about how or when in evolutionary time these capacities emerged, it is self evident that the genome of Homo sapiens did develop such capacities, just as it developed the human ability to cooperate effectively in groups. So the next question is, how does culture make these feats possible?
An answer offered by dual inheritance theorists is that humans’ enormous capacity for social learning enables adaptive information to be passed from one generation to the next, and that the human brain has evolved under natural selection to allow learners of culture to model their own actions on those of already enculturated “teachers” (though without the implication that they necessarily “teach” in any self conscious or explicit way).
Mixed Messages: Cultural and Genetic Inheritance in the Constitution of Human Society
- Organisms are not passive.
- The environment is a product of organisms.
- Interactions are reciprocal.
- Ecology, development, & evolution are interdependent.
Source: Niche Construction
- 🎧 Listen: How niche construction affects inheritance systems in human evolution
- PDF: Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students With Special Needs Succeed in School and Life, 2013 Annual COSA Conference Special Education Pre-Conference, Seaside, Oregon, June 19, 2013
- PDF: Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life
Collaborative Niche Construction
The unique human ability to adapt to new contexts, powered by neurodivergent creativity and the development of new tools, enabled humans to minimise conflicts and establish a presence in virtually all ecosystems on the planet. This level of adaptability is the signature trait of the human species.
NeurodiVentures are a concrete example of an emerging cultural species that provides safe and nurturing environments for divergent thinking, creativity, exploration, and collaborative niche construction. NeurodiVentures are built on timeless and minimalistic principles for coordinating trusted collaboration that predate the emergence of civilisation.
The Beauty of Collaboration at Human Scale: Timeless patterns of human limitations
Niche Communities
Autistic people have built many niche communities from the ground up—both out of necessity and because our interests and modes of being are, well, weird.
Unmasking Autism: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity (p. 218)
Unmasking Autism: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity (p. 153, 218)
Caves, Campfires, and Watering Holes
The three primordial learning spaces – Caves, Campfires, and Watering Holes – are essential to niche construction.
About 11 years ago I wrote a book called Campfires in Cyberspace that explored the idea that humans have always occupied one of four primordial learning spaces at any given time, ranging from the Campfire (home to the presentation of information by a teacher) to the Watering Hole (the domain of social learning from peers), the Cave (home of reflective construction) and Life (home to the construction of artifacts based on what we have learned). We explore the idea that, in an ideal setting, students will move between these spaces on their own and that computer technology has a positive role to play in each of these learning spaces.
Holtthink: Where Interwebs and Edtech Combine on Tumblr: Interview with David Thornburg author of “From the Campfire to the Holodeck: Creating Engaging and Powerful 21st Century Learning Environments.”
A Space of One’s Own
In schools, we find that the cave form of learning is never a priority. This is a serious problem because the millions of dollars spent on many new schools will do little to improve educational outcomes if they are built without cave spaces.
The Language of School Design : Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools : Nair, Prakash
…it is in solitude that students assimilate, synthesize and internalize learning so that it becomes knowledge and (sometimes) wisdom.
The Language of School Design : Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools : Nair, Prakash
When we operate within a space over which we feel ownership—a space that feels like it’s ours—a host of psychological and even physiological changes ensues. These effects were first observed in studies of a phenomenon known as the “home advantage”: the consistent finding that athletes tend to win more and bigger victories when they are playing in their own fields, courts, and stadiums. On their home turf, teams play more aggressively, and their members (both male and female) exhibit higher levels of testosterone, a hormone associated with the expression of social dominance.
But the home advantage is not limited to sports. Researchers have identified a more general effect as well: when people occupy spaces that they consider their own, they experience themselves as more confident and capable. They are more efficient and productive. They are more focused and less distractible. And they advance their own interests more forcefully and effectively. A study by psychologists Graham Brown and Markus Baer, for example, found that people who engage in negotiation within the bounds of their own space claim between 60 and 160 percent more value than the “visiting” party.
Benjamin Meagher, an assistant professor of psychology at Kenyon College in Ohio, has advanced an intriguing theory that may explain these outcomes. The way we act, the way we think, and even the way we perceive the world around us differ when we’re in a space that’s familiar to us—one that we have shaped through our own choices and imbued with our own memories of learning and working there in the past. When we’re on our home turf, Meagher has found, our mental and perceptual processes operate more efficiently, with less need for effortful self-control. The mind works better because it doesn’t do all the work on its own; it gets an assist from the structure embedded in its environment, structure that marshals useful information, supports effective habits and routines, and restrains unproductive impulses. In a familiar space over which we feel ownership, he suggests, “our cognition is distributed across the entire setting.” The place itself helps us think.
The Extended Mind – Annie Murphy Paul
Perhaps the most important form of control over one’s space is authority over who comes in and out—a point missed by those who believe that our workspaces should resemble a bustling coffeehouse. The informal exchanges facilitated by proximity are indeed generative. But the value of such interactions can be extracted only if it is also possible, when necessary, to avoid interacting at all.
The Extended Mind – Annie Murphy Paul
Living by her own rules has had a massive positive effect. She’s constantly making adjustments, finding new ways to make herself more comfortable. “Everything feels different, it really does impact everything. Like my body was masked!” she says. Now that her daily environment works with her body rather than against it, she feels physically and mentally free. Marta Rose writes that divergent design should honor the unique relationships Autistic people have to objects.
Unmasking Autism: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity (p. 16
The place itself helps us think.
The colleagues invited to join him (Cavendish) for a dish of mutton must have seen something amazing: a house transformed into a vast apparatus for interrogating the mysteries of existence.
Silberman, Steve. NeuroTribes: The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity (p. 27). Penguin Publishing Group.
Constructionism, collaborative niche construction, bricolage, and toolbelt theory go great together.
Constructionism, collaborative niche construction, bricolage, and toolbelt theory go great together. Imagine the possibilities in your spheres, especially for spiky profiles.
Learn how we use niche construction on our “Bricolage” page, our “Classroom UX” page, and our “Cavendish Space” page.