I’ve noticed a trend among neurodivergent and disabled speakers, notably Lydia X. Z. Brown and Jonathan Mooney, of prefacing their presentations with an access note and a bodymind affirmation. They encourage people, be it in an auditorium or a group video chat, to move around and get comfortable.
I believe we should all move in our space in whatever way is most comfortable for our bodyminds.
Please use this space as you need or prefer.
Sit in chairs or on the floor, pace, lie on the floor, rock, flap, spin, move around, come in and out of the room.
This is an invitation for you to consider what your bodymind needs to be as comfortable as possible in this moment.
This is an invitation to remind yourself to remember and to affirm that your bodymind has needs and that those needs deserve to be met, that your bodymind is valuable and worthy, that you deserve to be here, …, to belong.
Source: Against Ableism & White Supremacy: Disability Justice is Our Liberation – YouTube
I know that I myself could not sit still in a room like this for even 15 seconds. So if you are like me and you need to take a break during my presentation, that’s all good. You need to go to the back of the room and pace back and forth, I won’t be offended. You need to leave the room, it’s all good. I myself may wander off in the middle of my presentation, and you all will be accepting, inclusive, and accommodating of that for sure. (Laughter) But, hey, you know what, this is your time.
Source: Lab School Lecture Series – Jonathan Mooney – YouTube
We Stimpunks really like and appreciate these affirmations and need the access and understanding they offer, both online and in physical space. We bring our whole bodyminds — stims, senses, perceptual worlds, and all — to every learning experience.
Though autistic people live in the same physical world and deal with the same ‘raw material’, their perceptual world turns out to be strikingly different from that of non-autistic people.
Where disability comes into the picture is thinking about how someone’s body or mind might function best in an environment, a built environment or an emotional or communicative environment or infrastructure that perhaps wasn’t designed to begin with with that particular person’s bodily capacity or neurodivergence in mind.
Source: Making Work Accessible, Wherever it Happens – Distributed.blog
Flexibility makes a big difference in inclusion. Small changes have big impact.
Small changes that can easily be made to accommodate autism really do add up and can transform a young person’s experience of being in hospital. It really can make all the difference.
Autism + environment = outcome
Source: “It’s Not Rocket Science” – NDTi
Our family, by necessity, near constantly advocates and negotiates for these small changes. Small changes go a long way to bringing the access promised in access notes and bodymind affirmations.
For example, making cameras optional during video classes is a small change that makes a huge difference for us.
So I repeat my one small but crucial piece of advice (more than advice: it’s an admonition): Make cameras optional.
We should treat video presence in our online Fall emergency distance education courses in the way we treat all accessibility, building in digital accommodations in the way one would physical. If you or your institution requires presence, offer alternative forms for students for whom presence means disenfranchisement, hardship, shame, or lack of participation (ie. bandwidth–I had to turn off my video yesterday at our FI staff meeting in order that we could hear better). This is an opportunity for digital literacy and for demonstrating your concern for learning. What are your system’s capacities? Perhaps, if a student doesn’t want to be seen or cannot be, subtitles are the answer. Maybe chat. Maybe blogs before class or texting. There one that matters most: how can you, as an educator, find an open, equitable way to help students learn what you most want to offer them.
Source: Cameras Optional, Please! Remembering Student Lives As We Plan Our Online Syllabus | HASTAC
To fight Zoom fatigue, give people the freedom to turn their cameras off.
— Adam Grant (@AdamMGrant) August 26, 2021
New experiment: videos off reduces exhaustion and boosts engagement—especially for women and newcomers.
Cameras off doesn't reflect disengagement. It helps to prevent burnout and promote attention. pic.twitter.com/oBhwgIY0oE
A “cameras on” policy for classes and presentations, especially when the camera is used to enforce neurotypical notions of attention, is ableist and exclusionary.
"Turn your cameras on so I can observe your movements to assess whether or not I personally think you're paying attention." is ableist and absolutely not the solution this professor thinks it is.
— Death Cab for Callie, MS (@DeathCab4Callie) August 29, 2021
Attendance policies are weird. Your students are adults. https://t.co/a6ZWS4w33M
Wanting people to have their #Zoom camera on is #ableist. You do not need to see my face. If a person is uncomfortable with a camera in their face, then they shouldn't have to have it on. Period. #Neurotypicals, deal with it.
— Thorin (she/her) (@OtherBodhiGirl) January 6, 2021
For those of us with stims deemed anti-social, like nose-picking and scalp-gouging, turning off the camera allows us to stim and regulate without judgment, stigma, or distracting others. Stimming is an adaptive coping mechanism necessary to managing sensory overwhelm and attention. Making us sit still, in frame, on camera, suppressing stims is no way to learn.
A hostile learning environment, whether at home, school, or work, is a place where fear elicits the self-censoring instinct and shuts down the learning process.
Learners rarely put forth the effort to learn unless learner safety is in place. It’s a “build it and they will come” principle. If you don’t build it, they may still come, but they won’t learn.
Source: The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety (pp. 44-47)
In addition to allowing cameras off, complementing video chats with a text backchannel makes all the difference to including us. Before retiring, I had difficulties navigating the rise of video conferencing. Like Vint Cerf, I found it to be a huge challenge.
Around 1971, Ray Tomlinson developed the idea of networked electronic mail, which was hugely attractive to me because it replaced uncertain voice calls with the clarity of text. The development of the Internet was undertaken in the context of heavy use of email.
The rise of video conferencing has actually been a huge challenge for me as it reintroduces some of the uncertainty of voice calling and I look forward to real-time, automatic captioning to overcome the limitations that medium poses for me.
Source: Vint Cerf on accessibility, the cello and noisy hearing aids
Luckily, at the time, I was on a team that appreciated neurodiversity, differentiated instruction, and accessibility. We alternated meetings between video and text, allowed cameras off, and used a backchannel so I could type instead of talk during video sessions. Situational mutism marked my childhood and strikes me still, especially on group video.
And that’s not even touching on the ways this kind of technology supports the shy user, the user with speech issues, the user having trouble with the English Language, the user who’d rather be able to think through and even edit a statement or question before asking it.
Source: SpeEdChange: Bringing the “Back Channel” Forward
Let us stim. Let us move. Let us be kinetic. Let us turn off the camera. Let us type to talk. Don’t force us into non-compliance to meet our needs.
Our non-compliance is not intended to be rebellious. We simply do not comply with things that harm us. But since a great number of things that harm us are not harmful to most neurotypicals, we are viewed as untamed and in need of straightening up.
Make the small changes now, and affirm our divergent bodyminds as valid and belonging and not in need of straightening up.
Foster inclusion and belonging with an access note and bodymind affirmation at the beginning of your class, meeting, or presentation.
I’ll be using Lydia X. Z. Brown’s affirmation as a template:
I believe we should all move in our space in whatever way is most comfortable for our bodyminds.
Please use this space as you need or prefer.
Sit in chairs or on the floor, pace, lie on the floor, rock, flap, spin, move around, come in and out of the room.
This is an invitation for you to consider what your bodymind needs to be as comfortable as possible in this moment.
This is an invitation to remind yourself to remember and to affirm that your bodymind has needs and that those needs deserve to be met, that your bodymind is valuable and worthy, that you deserve to be here, …, to belong.
Source: Against Ableism & White Supremacy: Disability Justice is Our Liberation – YouTube
Leave a Reply