Stimpunks Foundation

Mutual Aid and Human-Centered Learning for Neurodivergent and Disabled People

blue and pink envelopes with dried flowers

Stimpunks Monthly Newsletter — August 2026

🗺️

Home » Blog » Newsletter » Stimpunks Monthly Newsletter — August 2026

From the pile to the garden. From the gate to the looking. From the summary to the source.

What we built, what we learned, what we’re doing next. This newsletter pulls from our Now page, where we work in public.

Read the Now Page · Get Help · Donate

🧠🌈 August at Stimpunks

From the pile to the garden. From the gate to the looking. From the summary to the source.

July was the month we made the work walkable. August was the month we built the instruments — and then found out what instruments cannot do.

We started by building the thing that remembers for us. The Stimpunks Knowledge System went from nothing to a working system in seven days, learned to index ideas instead of filenames, and immediately told us we had been arguing from books we did not own. Then we gave it away as a template anyone can take. Then came the gates: eight automated checks on ★ stuff, each of which found real faults on its first honest run, and each of which also reported perfect health while broken. And then the corrections — our own Impact numbers, our own financials, our own counts, our own citations — published as corrections rather than quietly swapped.

The broadside came home from ★ stuff to this site: a printable one-sheet you can photocopy and take into a meeting. Seven of them now. And ★ stuff itself went from twenty-nine zines to eighty, from seven field guides to twenty-two, with thirteen collections named after the fact — because the clusters had already formed in the material, and naming them afterward was the work.

Underneath all of it, one repeated finding. A star that appears to flicker is not flickering; the air is. A moss’s deficit list is entirely accurate and running backwards. A gate can tell you a page is wrong and never what shape it was supposed to be. Every remedy in the optics goes to the medium and none to the star — and that is not the hopeful part, because relocating a problem is the free half of the job.

August, in a sentence: we built the instruments, turned them on ourselves, and published what they found — including all the times the instrument was the thing that was wrong.

⚡ In 30 Seconds

  • We built the thing that remembers for us. The Stimpunks Knowledge System is a shared, self-maintaining home for our research library and our organizational knowledge, mirrored to two places the whole team can reach. It indexes ideas rather than filenames, keyed to the glossary we’ve maintained in public for years. Bus factor 1 is a design failure, and the mechanism is almost never a bus.
  • We gave it away. Start Your Own Knowledge Garden and Filling the Garden are the five steps and the missing half, and knowledge-garden-starter is the template. Step one needs no software. We also argued it as curriculum: school produces knowledge work for thirteen years and then throws nearly all of it away.
  • We corrected our own money, in both directions at once. Our published financials said 65% of spending went to program services. The books say 88% in 2025 and 93% so far in 2026 — we had been marking ourselves down by more than twenty points using a framework built for organizations that hold galas. And our 2025 annual report reported revenue of “approximately $120,000.” Actual 2025 revenue was $32,599, against $122,626 spent. Where the Money Went now publishes the $90,027 deficit and the ratio underneath it: $17.64 spent for every dollar a person gave.
  • We rebuilt Impact around the section it had been promising and not delivering. Seven admissions, each specific enough to check. The sharpest is about us: our grant windows are published months ahead and still fill fifty applications in under a week, which makes them a speed test — and speed tests filter for the least Disabled applicant in the pool.
  • The broadside came home. Stimpunks Broadsides is a new library of printable one-sheets, CC0, made to be photocopied and carried into a room where a decision is being made. Seven sheets now, from Eye Contact to Developmental Pace to Boring Technology.
  • ★ stuff became a library. Twenty-nine zines became eighty; seven field guides became twenty-two; thirteen collections, print and listening racks, and eight automated gates. The categories were outputs, not inputs — two people noticed the same clusters had already formed, and naming them afterward was the work. Nearly every category a Disabled person gets sorted into arrives the other way round.
  • We paid the citation debts we had been carrying without noticing. Neuronormativity is Nick Walker’s. Caves, campfires and watering holes are David Thornburg’s. Lilipadding is Tanya Adkin and David Gray-Hammond’s. The five love locutions are Amythest Schaber’s, and the citation loop closed on our own most-read page with the hedge stripped somewhere on the way round. A word used once looks borrowed. A word used fifteen times looks like vocabulary.
  • We built a room for the credit that never gets given at all. A #props-and-gratitude channel in our community — props is short for proper respect, taken from WordPress core — for the work that does not ship: a bug report, a proofread, a ride, a hard conversation, a day somebody covered for you. Recognition is not a bonus for exceptional work, it is maintenance.
  • We wrote down an access rider. Ryan’s access rider splits needs into Essential and Desirable and says what the second one costs. “A hand on the shoulder is not a kindness; it is an injury risk.” And: “‘Accessible’ on a venue website is a claim, not a fact.”
  • We named psychological torture. A community member arrived with a phrase that describes their experience truly and fails as a citation. The recognized name is psychological torture, defined by the UN Special Rapporteur, which names materialist bias — the conviction that real harm leaves a mark — as an error. Autistic and Disabled people were told the word was hyperbole. It was a correct application of a term whose legal definition we had never been handed.
  • Helen went from credited to co-author to author. Three weeks ago a zine was written after Helen Edgar; in August one was built with her, and then one arrived from her as a draft. ★ stuff is now formally a Stimpunks Foundation × More Realms collaboration — and per-piece credit did not change, because a shared mark is not a shared byline.
  • And we kept finding that the problem was not where the sentence had put it. You Cannot Correct the Sky: the star is not flickering, the air is, and every remedy goes to the medium. Being right about where a problem lives has never by itself built a single ramp.

Stimpunks now has a memory nobody has to hold alone, eight machines that check our work, a shelf of sheets you can photocopy, and a written account of everything those machines still cannot see.

🗞️ News

Writing the Dawn

Our Co-Creative Director Helen Edgar is supporting “Writing the Dawn”.

Writing the Dawn aims to shine a light on the natural world through writing workshops, coaching, and mentoring. We are based in Scotland, and are inspired by some of the most beautiful landscapes in the world.

Our science and nature writing workshops are currently delivered online, while retaining the cosy, or ‘coorie’, spirit of a neuro-affirming writers’ retreat.

Writing The Dawn

Helen will be offering online body doubling sessions each Tuesday, 10-11am BST, starting next week, 8th Sept.

You are very welcome to join – free tickets or by donation.

Book here: Gather & Write: Body Doubling Session | Tixtree

Helen is setting up a creative network, so if any of you are able to share social media posts, it will be really appreciated!

Writing The Dawn (@writingthedawn.bsky.social) — Bluesky

Writing The Dawn (@writingthedawn) • Instagram photos and videos

Writing The Dawn | Facebook

Writing The Dawn Creative Workshops and Coaching | LinkedIn

Writing_the _Dawn | Substack

Workshops | Writing The Dawn

Stimpunks Broadsides

A new library of printable one-sheets launched mid-month. A broadside is a single sheet you can photocopy and hand across a table: the refusal on one side, what to do instead on the other. They’re CC0, they’re seeded by the Why Sheets, and they exist because a link is no use in a meeting where nobody is holding a phone.

Seven are up: Eye Contact, Behaviorism, Sensory Access at Work, At the Door, Cavendish Space, Developmental Pace, and Boring Technology.

A Guest Post: PDA, Punk Rock, and Non Violent Communication

Peyton Belunek — a Disabled and AuDHD writer, death doula, and Non Violent Communication practitioner — looks around her first punk show and finds that the too-tight rules with no logic behind them simply do not apply in that room. She names the mosh pit a communal stim: the same body that could not bear an accidental knock in a school hallway went looking for consented, rhythmic, co-created chaos at the front of the stage. The difference was never the sensation. It was who chose it.

Then she takes the acronym apart. Pathological Demand Avoidance landed on her as a verdict about her character; Persistent Desire for Autonomy landed as a description of her nervous system. Same profile, and only one of them leaves room for self-compassion. Her friend Mellie asked her: “Don’t you think your PDA has often been your courage?”

Unlearning Toward Hope: A Campfire for Jason Arday

We built a memorial that is also a briefing, from two of his own talks rather than from anything written about him. It says on its face that we are doing this because he is gone, and because of how he was taken. Its line is “What we are bereft of is care.”

Eight days before that session, our library held Arday exactly once, inside a citation in somebody else’s writing, and this site cited him nowhere. By Friday two of his talks had been transcribed into the library and built into a Campfire. The measure of a library is not what it holds. It is whether the thing you need is already in it on the day you need it.

A Room for Proper Respect

Our community gained a #props-and-gratitude channel, a Collaborative Nonsense category — where a pinned post argues that typing one word is a complete contribution, parallel play in text form and body doubling without the pressure — and a name for the community tree: Pando, after the aspen colony that is one organism.

No leaderboard, no obligation to reciprocate, no @ if somebody would rather not be named in public, and self-props welcome.

📊 Impact Snapshot

📈 Reach

  • 5.2k Bluesky followers, plus 2.5k on Facebook, 1,599 on Instagram, 843 on Mastodon, 734 on LinkedIn, 554 on Threads
  • 1,481 pages published in the knowledge garden — the real count, replacing a figure that had been quietly wrong on the Impact page and in three separate sentences around it
  • 80 Google Scholar results, up from a published 65 that had gone stale
  • ★ stuff grew from 29 zines to 80, and from 7 field guides to 22
  • Our research library became searchable for the first time — including 4,159 fetched bookmark pages out of 10,739, with the other 6,580 laid out as a table of recorded refusals and their reasons

🧾 Publishing Output (August, Weeks 32–35)

🔖 Headline Publications

✨ The Month in Themes

August had four movements. Here’s how they fit together.

Week 32 — From the Pile to the Garden: The System That Remembers For Us

We built our memory, and the first thing it did was tell us what we didn’t have.

Bus factor 1 is a design failure, and the mechanism is almost never a bus. It’s burnout, a flare, leave, or six weeks where reading a PDF is not going to happen — normal human variation, and a system that treats it as an exception is the thing that’s badly designed. So we built a knowledge system that no single laptop and no single person is a single point of failure for. Interdependence means building so that any one of us can be absent.

A filename index tells you what you own. It cannot tell you what you understand. So the index learned to hold ideas, keyed to the glossary we have maintained in public for years rather than a private scheme a machine dreamed up. Then it told us the truth about ourselves, and none of it was flattering: deficit ideology is load-bearing across this site and rested on exactly one asset that so much as cited Paul Gorski; Damian Milton was referenced inside 79 of our files and we held not one paper of his. Four books later that is less true — the first time our own tooling has sent us shopping.

And the garden was never silent. A sweep for what we hold on curiosity came back empty, and we nearly published a glossary draft saying our own library could not support the entry. Susan Engel’s Children’s Need to Know had been in our bookmarks the whole time. The cause is worth naming precisely: our bookmark ingest stored records and no page text, so a tool that cannot see a corpus does not report thin coverage — it reports silence, with total confidence. 4,159 pages of real text are indexed now, and the honest figure is printed rather than rounded up, with every refusal counted out loud. An honest 38.5% you can audit is worth more than a hundred percent nobody counted.

Then we gave it away. The obvious answer to Helen wanting her own knowledge system was a copy of ours, and that was wrong — a fork would have arrived broken and she’d have spent her first day un-Stimpunksing it. So there’s a template anyone can take and a page to arrive at: Start Your Own Knowledge Garden, five steps that degrade gracefully, because a tool that only pays off once you’ve finished configuring it gets abandoned during configuration, on a bad day, by exactly the person who needed it.

And everything we built to watch our work caught us. A sync deleted 1,014 of 1,466 mirrored files on a variable that meant the wrong thing. A staleness alarm turned out not to be miscalibrated but structurally incapable of firing. We counted the animations on this site believing there was one, and found 80 across 41 pages, not one of them honoring reduced motion. And 29 glossary links we cite in good faith return 404, missed for years because our own link checker carried /glossary/ on an exemption list and exited 0 every single time. An exemption that was correct when it was written becomes invisible the moment it stops being true.

A pile of files is not a memory until something knows how the pieces connect.

— Week 32 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 32 →

Week 33 — From the Gate to the Looking: Six Machines and the Edge Where They Stop

We built the machines that check our work, found the exact edge where they stop being able to help, and corrected our own numbers in both directions.

The gates take the mechanical part. They do not take the looking. Six automated checks shipped this week. The last one swept 102 pages and 55,193 measured pieces of text, found seven faults and produced no false positives — including four zine covers that had been printing an unreadable caption across their own titles for weeks. Real work, and none of it is the hard part. Every fault that changed an argument was caught by a person reading: a whale shark drawn facing away from the plankton streaming past its tail, “climb out” arrows pointing downward, a neck that meant the opposite of its caption. A collision is a position. An argument is not.

A number you measured once is not a number you know. Our Impact page said 1,300 pages when it was 1,481, and 65 Scholar citations when it was 80. Our published financials said 65% of spending went to program services; the books say 88% in 2025 and 93% so far in 2026. Our 2025 annual report conflated budget with revenue and implied a balanced year while concealing a $90,027 deficit. Every corrected page names the old figure and calls it wrong. And the counting stops where the work stops being countable, which the page also says: we do not track the non-monetary aid and we are not going to start. Metric fixation measures what is easy to count under ideal conditions and then blames Disabled people for failing it. We would rather be legibly uncountable.

The broadside came home. Broadsides launched with five sheets in one evening. Getting there meant admitting that both our existing broadsides called themselves “a two-sided single sheet” and neither one was — three faults no existing check could see, each found only by rendering the actual paper. The ninth sheet took longest: Not a Line draws the spiky profile in order to refuse it, because nearly everyone reaching for that card has already met the picture and thinks it is the answer, and you cannot refuse a picture you have not shown.

And credit turned out to be part of the work. We are tedious about citing claims, which is precisely why we had never cited the things that taught us how to hold one. Six zines exist because Ryan watched Ze Frank’s True Facts with a young person in our community whose special interest is sharks — and his name appeared nowhere in that project at all. Lies-to-children is Cohen and Stewart’s, not Pratchett’s. And a widely circulated Brian Eno definition of scenius is not what he wrote — our own glossary entry introduces the altered text with “His actual definition is.” Five internal copies of a wrong quote read as five confirmations, which is precisely how it survived.

Zero failures out of zero elements measured is not a clean page; it is a page nobody looked at, and in the output the two are identical.

— Week 33 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 33 →

Week 34 — From the Gate to the Criterion: Arrival Records and Origin Records

Four instruments reported perfect health while broken, each in a novel way. What caught things was people reading — and, once, a written-down criterion.

A gate tells you a page is wrong. A criterion tells you what shape it was supposed to be. A day-window guard refused the correct call and silently permitted the wrong one. A search-coverage ratio guarded an absolute quantity of prose, so it leaked worst on the pages that scored best and printed 93% beside a page whose entire argument was unindexed. A front page went from 111 search records to 14 — 87% unfindable — while the builder printed its tidy per-page line and carried on. And a nesting check, built for exactly one fault, passed that fault clean, exit 0. No amount of adding gates covers the next one, because each was a new way of being wrong. The gap is closed by more criteria, not more gates.

Counts do not drift. They get incremented. A number bumped from the last known value inherits whatever was wrong with the last known value and arrives wearing a fresher date. Monday’s corrected figure was still wrong on Tuesday for exactly that reason. No gate can read a number written out in prose, so the only control is re-derivation — count the actual pages, every time. That is the standing rule we apply to aggregators, turned on ourselves.

A citation and a props are one sentence in two registers: this did not come from nowhere. Four load-bearing terms had no attribution anywhere in the project, and the reason is not carelessness but frequency. Neuronormativity is on fifteen of our pages and is Nick Walker’s. Caves, campfires and watering holes are David Thornburg’s, and reading him at primary turned up a fourth space the circulating version drops. And Field Guide No. 14 credited “the Stimpunks page” five times for an essay with Betsy Selvam’s byline on it the whole time. The one source that got flattened into an institution is the one that came from inside — and a collectively-run site is exactly where an author is likeliest to disappear into the masthead.

And an arrival record is not an origin record. The Light Arrived Before the Name starts from the fact that light leaves with nothing written on it — a photon carries a wavelength and a direction and not a discoverer — so a name in astronomy records only who was standing there with an instrument. Grunya Sukhareva described six Autistic boys in Moscow in 1925; the paper reached English in 1996, half a century after two other men’s names had been fixed to what she wrote. And the DSM-5 concedes that traits “may be masked by learned strategies in later life.” The manual is describing light-travel time. Somebody diagnosed at forty-seven has not been Autistic since forty-seven — the paperwork is forty-seven years old and the light is not.

Recognition is not a bonus for exceptional work, it is maintenance.

— Week 34 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 34 →

Week 35 — From the Star to the Air: The Problem Was Not Where the Sentence Put It

The month’s clearest idea arrived last, in seven materials at once.

The star is not flickering. You Cannot Correct the Sky starts from a control experiment free on any clear night: starlight crosses the whole distance without incident and arrives at the top of the atmosphere steady, so everything that happens to it happens in the last few microseconds. Planets barely twinkle through the same air on the same night — not because anything about a planet is tougher, but because they are wide enough that no single cell of air can speak for the whole of them. Then the hinge, which is not the comforting half: every remedy goes to the medium and none to the star. The social model of disability performs the same relocation, and that was the necessary move and is also the free one. It costs nothing, takes an afternoon, and has never by itself produced a single ramp.

Then the same shape, six more times. Measured Against a Tree: every line of the moss’s deficit list is true, and the tree discarded the moss’s solution rather than the moss failing to reach the tree’s. Oblivious to Encounter: interchangeability was produced in people, by force, because a mill required it as an input.

Reading the primary does not confirm a draft. It changes what the draft is about. Eleven times this week a source was read at the source, and not one of those readings was a verification. Roger Bacon’s observer-dependence argument, his three control cases and his latitude arithmetic were sitting in the primary, unmentioned by every secondary account. Four of those readings happened because a book was physically handed over, every reachable version online having been an aggregator.

And a hedge is the first thing to fall off a sentence in transit. David Byrne wrote “a very mild (I think) form of Asperger’s syndrome” — every load-bearing word is a qualifier, one of them a man doubting his own self-assessment inside its own parenthesis — and what travelled was proudly identifies as autistic. Barry Lopez asked for living in some sort of ethical unity with a place, and the compression to “reciprocal ethical unity” hardens a deliberate hedge into a term of art — and two of our own glossary entries carry it. Richard Dawkins retracted his most-quoted sentence in the front of every subsequent copy, and it is still the one people quote. Nothing about being right makes a sentence travel.

We also named something a community member had been living without a word for. They arrived with a phrase that describes their experience truly and fails as a citation — and what search engines return under it braids three real bodies of work together with material from the targeted-individuals milieu at equal visual weight. That braid is the dangerous part, because the standard move against a survivor is to dismiss compelling evidence as a conspiracy theory. The recognized name is psychological torture. And the part that stopped us is that we did not need the UN to reach it — Lydia X. Z. Brown wrote in 2016 that it is “totally legal to torture disabled people in the name of treatment and help,” and that sentence has been sitting in our Ableism entry the whole time. The evidence was ours. What we lacked was the permission slip.

Knowing exactly where a problem lives does not make it cheap to fix. It only makes it impossible to keep blaming the wrong thing.

— Week 35 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 35 →

🗺️ New to Stimpunks? Where to Start in August’s Work

August produced a lot. Here’s a guided path through it.

If you’re walking into a meeting where a decision is being made about someone:

→ Stimpunks Broadsides — print one, take it with you

→ Developmental Pace — at grade level averages the peaks and troughs into one figure and then treats the figure as the child

→ Not a Line — the card you hand across the table when somebody is about to say mild

If you want to keep what you read:

→ Start Your Own Knowledge Garden — step one needs no software

→ Filling the Garden — how things actually get in, with no terminal commands

→ The Knowledge System as Curriculum — why schools should teach this and don’t

If you’re a funder, board member, or partner doing due diligence:

→ Where the Money Went — the deficit, published

→ Impact — including the seven places we fall short

→ Accountability & Transparency — the whole shelf

If you’re arranging access for someone, or trying to ask for your own:

→ Ryan’s Access Rider — Essential and Desirable, and what Desirable costs

→ Form Accessibility and Meeting Your Needs — a request form with no justification field

→ Co-Design — the difference between being consulted and being in the room

If someone has told you the word you’re using is too strong:

→ Psychological Torture

→ Ableism

→ Behaviorism — the broadside

If you build websites and care whether they work:

→ Designing for Motion — we believed there was one animation and there were eighty

→ Zoom and Reflow — measure what the reader can do, not what the document reports

→ Controls That Defer — ask what your control does when it is broken, not when it works

If you need something to read that is only for delight:

→ ★ stuff — eighty zines and twenty-two field guides now

→ PDA, Punk Rock, and Non Violent Communication

→ Infodumplings: Take a Whiff

🧭 The Gate, the Criterion, and the Person

The most significant thing about August was not a single publication. It was the same discovery arriving in four different disguises, one per week, until it was impossible to keep mistaking it for four separate problems.

We spent the month building instruments. An index that holds ideas. A search that finds a passage when your words and ours don’t match. Eight automated gates. A drift check on the page that describes our own system. A coverage report that prints its own refusals. Every one of them is real, and every one of them caught things a person would not have.

And every one of them, at some point in August, reported perfect health while broken. A guard that refused the right call. A coverage ratio that leaked worst on the pages that scored best. A nesting check that passed the exact fault it was built for. A link checker that exited 0 every time because the one prefix worth checking was on its exemption list. A search index that returns success with two thousand documents unembedded. None of them errored. In the output, a page nobody looked at and a page with nothing wrong are the same page.

So the useful question stopped being how do we add another gate and became what kind of thing is a gate. A gate is a position: two words are on top of each other, this link 404s, this count says eleven and there are thirteen. That is genuinely worth automating, and we will keep automating it. But nothing that changed an argument in August was a position. A whale shark facing away from the plankton. A citation pointing at the wrong person. A refusal that put an otter on the stand as a witness for us. A four-word sentence counted as six, printed in thirteen places. A collision is a position. An argument is not, and there is no version of a checker that sees one.

What closed the gap was two things, and neither one is a machine.

The first is a criterion — a rule written down in advance about what shape the thing was supposed to be. When a zine arrived with its central fact opening and closing it and doing nothing in between, no gate could see that. But it failed a written-down register test, and reading the draft against that test produced a specific answer and a specific fix rather than a matter of taste. The gap between the machines and the reading is not closed by more vigilance. It is closed by more criteria.

The second is a person who reads. Helen Edgar caught three faults in two zines in a single Tuesday, all three about what a sentence does rather than what it says. A reader requested a piece and the search of our own garden came back completely empty. A community member arrived with a phrase, and the work of the week was finding them the name that would survive a hostile fact-check. Every one of those is a person being in the room.

Which is the same argument the ★ stuff work kept making from the other end. The star is not flickering; the air is. The moss did not fail to reach the tree. Every remedy in the optics goes to the medium and none to the star — and relocating a problem is the free part. Being right about where a fault lives has never by itself built a ramp, paid a grant, or made a room usable. What it settles is whose problem it is, which is the argument that has to be won before anybody is asked to spend anything on it.

That is why the month’s corrections were published rather than absorbed. It’s why our grant windows get named as a speed test before we’ve fixed them, and why the deficit is on the page. Measure what can be measured, say out loud what the measurement cannot reach, and then go and read the thing.

Broken systems, not broken people. Broken thresholds, not broken people. And a green tick is not the same object as an honest page.

Receipts: Working in Public

We default to open whenever we can.

🔭 What We’re Doing Next

📄 Broadsides and Sheets

  • Keep the Broadsides library growing — one sheet at a time, each one a refusal on one side and what to do instead on the other
  • Keep the sheets, the Why Sheets and the glossary in step, in whichever direction the work runs — a broadside commissioned its own glossary entry this month, which was new

🌱 The Knowledge Garden

  • Keep the page that describes it honest; it went stale in twenty-three days without anybody neglecting it
  • Support anyone starting from the template — including people who have never opened a terminal
  • Grow the coverage of what we can actually search, and keep publishing the refusals alongside it

⚙️ Gates, Criteria, and Reading

  • Keep the gates, and stop expecting them to grow into judgement
  • Write down more criteria — the register tests, the style rules, the things a draft can be read against
  • Re-derive counts rather than incrementing them, everywhere they are quoted and not only where they live

🤝 Credit, Community, and Partners

💸 Funding & Sustainability

We are building the infrastructure we wish existed. If this work matters to you, help fund it, partner with us, or share the tools with someone who needs them.

One Good Line

“Accessible” on a venue website is a claim, not a fact.

Ryan’s Access Rider – Stimpunks Foundation

📚 Three Things Worth Revisiting

In case you missed them — or they’re newly relevant:

  • Stimpunks Broadsides — seven printable one-sheets, CC0, made to be photocopied. A link is no use in a meeting where nobody is holding a phone. Print Developmental Pace before the next annual review, or Behaviorism before the next placement meeting.
  • Where the Money Went — $122,626 spent against $32,599 of revenue in 2025, which is $17.64 spent for every dollar a person gave. We published the deficit instead of the flattering version. Share it with anyone who wants to know what a nonprofit looks like when it stops managing its image.
  • Start Your Own Knowledge Garden — one folder of untouched originals, one index with a line about why each thing is there, a habit of adding to both. That’s a garden. No app, no subscription, no AI. Send this to the person who keeps losing what they read.

How You Can Help This Month

Need help?

Support the work

Share

Stimpunks Foundation · stimpunks.org · Mutual Aid and Human-Centered Learning for Neurodivergent and Disabled People

Changelog · Now · Donate · Get Help

Posted

in

by

Ryan Boren

Tags:

Discover more from Stimpunks Foundation

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading