Stimpunks Foundation

Mutual Aid and Human-Centered Learning for Neurodivergent and Disabled People

blue and pink envelopes with dried flowers

Stimpunks Monthly Newsletter — July 2026

🗺️

Home » Blog » Newsletter » Stimpunks Monthly Newsletter — July 2026

From the tangle to the map. From the door to the whole building. From the warning to the welcome.

What we built, what we learned, what we’re doing next. This newsletter pulls from our Now page, where we work in public.

Read the Now Page · Get Help · Donate

🧠🌈 July at Stimpunks

From the tangle to the map. From the door to the whole building. From the warning to the welcome.

June was the month the method got a name and found its ancestors. July was the month we made the work walkable.

We started by untangling the AI pages into a map, and found a root underneath them — Dinah Murray, who understood the computer as a place an Autistic person could be. Then we opened two new front doors that don’t ask you to explain yourself: Cavendish Cards, where you point at a picture instead of performing an account of your needs, and ★ stuff, which says you were made of stars long before anyone asked you to earn your place. Then we turned the same openness on ourselves — publishing a PESTEL and SWOT most organizations keep private, and an index of the nine papers we steer by. And we ended the month by drawing the whole building, giving every guide an address you can link to, handing readers eight fonts and their own light, and replacing legal jargon with a Terms of Use that welcomes reuse instead of forbidding it.

There was a rest week in the middle, and we let it be one. Fungi work in the quiet and the dark. So did we.

July, in a sentence: we made our systems legible — to readers, to citers, to machines, to funders — while defending every person’s right to stay opaque.

⚡ In 30 Seconds

  • We drew the whole building. The Site Directory lays out all fourteen sections and every one of our hundreds of pages as plain accessible lists. Where the Orientation Map points you at the right door, the directory shows you the building. Nothing hides behind a menu you have to guess at.
  • We made the AI pages a map instead of a pile. Rebuilt /ai/ as a front door, split the alignments cluster into its own home at AI Ethics — Alignments and External Frameworks, and published Evaluating Relational AI Tools and AI and Competency Networks.
  • We found the root of everything we say about machines. Autism and Computing: The Root of Our Online Space and Inside the Tunnel read Dinah Murray as bloodline, not resemblance. Monotropism, the online space, and the machine all trace to the same researcher. Memory is the practice.
  • We got a name we’d been missing. Spaces of Relational Opacity names relational opacity — the right not to be fully decoded as the price of recognition.
  • We opened two new front doors, neither of which asks you to say it out loud. Cavendish Cards is a CC0 55-card deck where a child points instead of explains — a design brief, not a behavior report. ★ stuff takes settled science — every atom heavier than hydrogen was forged inside a star — and reads it as an argument about belonging. Belonging is constitutive, not conferred.
  • We read the weather in the open. Reading the Weather: Our Strategic Environment publishes a PESTEL and SWOT beside our finances and governance, not behind them. We publish our strengths to be useful and our weaknesses to be trusted.
  • We named what we steer by. Framing Documents gathers the nine papers we navigate by into one index, and Why? answers the first question anyone should ask. A compass you can read is a compass you can be held to.
  • We let you choose how you read. Dark mode arrived on a Solarized palette, then theme, font, and text size moved behind one “Aa Reading” panel with eight fonts — including our first serif. The home page got much, much faster on the way.
  • We traded a warning for a welcome. The new Terms of Use affirmatively welcomes citing, quoting, embedding, translating, and remixing under CC BY-SA 4.0. A terms page can be a threshold you’re welcomed across.
  • We gave the journey a hub. The Reframer’s Journey gathers the seven stops of our opening scrollytelling passage, each rewritten from the ground up, as the narrative entry point the analytical series build on.
  • And we rested. Week 28 let the Campfires and Infodumplings carry the week. Our partners at the Lilypad Library — which Stimpunks fiscally sponsors — launched their Kickstarter. Helen wrote about otters and solidarity.

Stimpunks now has a building anyone can walk, a compass anyone can check, a deck that needs no words, and a word for the right to stay unread.

🗞️ News

Helen Joins Writing the Dawn

Our Co-Creative Director Helen Edgar (Autistic Realms) joined “Writing The Dawn” as Creative Support Lead alongside Barb Melville and team. A space where biodiversity, neurodiversity & creativity meet. Neurodivergent-led community for writing, creating & sharing — LGBTQIA+ & neuro-affirming, anti-racist. Follow to find out more and share your work & inspiration.

NeuroHub Mental Health Conference — August 14 – 16

We’ll be attending the “2026 Autistic mental health conference by NeuroHub Community“. Join us.

The NeuroHub Mental Health Conference is rooted in our core belief that neurodivergent voices should lead the conversation about neurodivergent lives. Shaped by our ethos, the conference centres lived experience, alongside research and education created by neurodivergent individuals themselves—not framed solely through external observation. We move beyond deficit-based, pathology-driven narratives and instead champion the neurodivergent paradigm: one that recognises difference, celebrates creativity, and honours the depth, insight, and potential of those who experience the world in uniquely powerful ways.

2026 Autistic mental health conference – NeuroHub Community

📊 Impact Snapshot

📈 Reach

🧾 Publishing Output (July, Weeks 27–31)

🔖 Headline Publications

✨ The Month in Themes

July had five movements. Here’s how they fit together.

Week 27 — From the Tangle to the Map: The Machine Finds Its Root

The AI pages had grown faster than their architecture could hold. This week we gave the pile a shape — and found what it grew from.

The cluster got a map. We rebuilt /ai/ as an overview that names and links every AI page we have, so a reader lands on the map before the pages. We split the alignments cluster off AI and Disability Justice into its own home, AI Ethics — Alignments and External Frameworks, then wired the two together and restored the old anchor so nothing breaks. Three alignments landed on the new hub: the Critical AI Handbook from Human Restoration Project as the lead entry — same Freirean root, same enemies, the pedagogy half of a project whose disability-justice half is this site — plus Cognitive Uploading and Campbell Walker’s documentary “The AI Question No One Wants to Ask”. Walker refuses “AI” as a single thing and turns Tony Benn’s five questions of power into a teaching tool. Six convergences, then the gap: the essay never reaches disability, and its map has no cell for the Disabled person using a tool to survive an inaccessible system. Converges toward, stops short of.

And we published a page for the tools that ask you to rehearse. Evaluating Relational AI Tools asks five questions before you trust a tool that has you practice intimacy, conflict, and vulnerability with a simulated partner. The throughline is a hard one: a tool that trains an Autistic person to practice until they pass is reinforcing masking, and masking carries documented links to burnout and suicidality.

The machine has a root, and her name is Dinah Murray. We published Autism and Computing: The Root of Our Online Space, added a 1999 Murray & Lesser lineage coda to Monotropic AI, and published Inside the Tunnel: How to Sit Beside a Monotropic Learner, a crosswalk of Murray’s 2011 “therapy with computers.” Monotropism, the online space, and the machine all trace to the same researcher, who saw the computer as a place an Autistic person could be. When we say the screen is infrastructure — which is why the gaming page is now Screens Are Infrastructure — we are saying what Murray said.

And a crosswalk handed us a name we lacked. Spaces of Relational Opacity and Our Learning Space reads Ahmetovic, De Jaegher, Williams, and Grace’s 2026 paper against our learning space and lands where Cavendish Space already stood: communicative breakdown between Autistic and non-Autistic people is an ecological misalignment in the room, not a deficit in the Autistic person. The paper cites Autistic SPACE, already in our garden, so the convergence read less like a discovery than a reunion. And it names the thing we’d been circling — relational opacity, the right not to be fully decoded as the price of recognition.

The AI pages stopped being a pile and became a map — a front door, a split, a set of crosswalks. And, a root: Dinah Murray, who saw the machine as a place we could be.

— Week 27 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 27 →

Week 28 — From Working to Resting: The Week the Events Carried

A rest week, and we let it be one. No new architecture, no marathon builds. We gathered, we watched, we counted our spoons, and we let the rhythm hold us instead of the other way around.

Campfire Learn Together: The Mycelial Worldview Is Punk gathered two short films on fungi as master decomposers — distributed intelligence with no commanding center, punk science and punk law, and the power of working in the quiet and the dark. A fitting text for a rest week: the most important work is often the slow, unseen kind. Infodumplings: Spoon Theory did exactly what a rest week needs — it made the ration of energy something we name out loud and share. And Campfire Munch Together: Why Don’t Fascists Eat Vegetables? set up a samefood mukbang watch-along, then drew the line clean: samefoods are self-knowledge, access, and bodymind autonomy. The grift the essay dissects is control and domination. They are not the same thing.

A partner went to Kickstarter. The Lilypad Library, which Stimpunks fiscally sponsors, launched a campaign for a brand-new preschool television pilot by Kiersten Case. Fiscal sponsorship is one of the quiet mechanics of mutual aid: it lets a project stand up, take payments, and reach the public without first having to build an entire organization underneath it. This week that scaffolding did its job.

And Helen wrote about otters. Stimpunks Solidarity and Otters reads the otter cam our Solidarity Session watches together as an embodied version of what the session already is. The otter keeps a favorite stone tucked in a pouch of skin and returns to it again and again, the way a stim tool or a special interest works. The otters play alone, drift together for a moment of shared delight, then drift back into their own absorption — a cave and a watering hole in one animal. The point isn’t that otters are soothing to watch, though they are. It’s that they get to just be otters, and in a space held away from the dominance of neuronormativity, so do we.

Even a rest week leaves a few tracks: we expanded Space Bunny with Treebeard’s art and a “get your head in the clouds” section that reclaims a rebuke as an invitation, and published AI and Competency Networks — the line between augmentation and extraction, between AI that makes a person’s thinking more legible to the group and AI that screens it behind fluent output.

A rest week, and we let it be one. The events carried it, and the recovery filled the gaps between.

— Week 28 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 28 →

Week 29 — From the Word to the Card: Two Doors That Need No Words

Two front doors opened this week, and neither one asks you to say it out loud.

Cavendish Cards hands someone a picture instead of a performance. The new open deck grew out of the Cavendish Space Project, and the argument is in what it refuses. A child points at a card, or lays a few — no reading required, no scoring, no winners. Lay cave, buzzy, headphones and you’ve been handed a design brief, not a behavior report. The 80+-card starter deck runs across seven families — Places, Weather, What helps, Lily pads, Growers, Love Locutions, and an Interaction family drawn from the Autistic community’s color communication badges. It’s CC0 and community-authored: one card per file, a contributor template, a facilitator sheet for support staff. The guardrails are load-bearing: the person controls sharing, there’s no scoring, it is not a screening tool, and it never replaces AAC. It augments a child’s legibility to the people around them, on their own terms — and it refuses the pathology paradigm, deficit ideology, and behaviorism.

★ stuff says the need was never a deficit. Our new microsite is built on one line we keep coming back to: Love You Down To Your Star Stuff. Every atom heavier than hydrogen was forged inside a star; the calcium in your bones and the iron in your blood came from stars that lived and died before the Earth existed. The site takes that settled science and reads it as an argument about belonging — if we are all made of the same stellar matter, then neurodivergent and Disabled people belong here fully, not despite our differences but as them. Twenty nine zines so far, from Bone Song to The Dead Stars Still Reach Us, alongside the Star Stuff Manifesto and the Neurodiversity and Constellation field guides. Belonging is constitutive, not conferred. 💫

We named the dread that lands at the edge of a change. Threshold Anxiety is a working term for a common experience that existing language only names in pieces, so the entry pulls the pieces together: the cost of transitions for monotropic minds, anticipatory anxiety, Elaine Heumann Gurian’s “threshold fear,” and the anthropology of liminality — limen is Latin for “threshold.” Broken thresholds, not broken people. It’s carded in Cavendish Cards as the big step weather card.

And we found a researcher reaching our refusal from the far end of the ladder. The System-Level Organisational Design Framework: An ARLES Crosswalk reads Jessica Dark’s 2026 Frontiers in Psychology framework against ARLES. Dark is an Autistic researcher in Organisational Psychology, and this one starts closer to home than most — the mechanism at its heart, neuro-cognitive trait interaction, is the same one our From Traits to Patterns bridge already credits to her. So it’s lineage at the traits layer, not a cold external read. The crosswalk lays the grid over the ladder: her four domains fill ARLES’s top three rungs, fold Attention into Systems, and leave no cell for Lived Experience. It converges on the refusal — broken systems, not broken people — and stops short at exactly the two things that make ARLES load-bearing: the ordering and the regulation floor.

We built two front doors and left them open. One lets a child show a need without a word; the other says the need was never a deficit — you were star stuff before anyone asked you to prove it.

— Week 29 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 29 →

Week 30 — From the Weather to the Compass: Reading Ourselves in Public

This week we turned the openness on ourselves.

We read the weather out loud. Reading the Weather: Our Strategic Environment publishes a PESTEL and SWOT of the whole organization — the kind most organizations keep private — under Accountability, beside our finances and governance rather than behind them. It names the storm bearing down on Disabled and neurodivergent people: special-education enforcement hollowed out even where the law still stands, Medicaid cuts reaching the assistive tech people rely on, a DEI rollback that turns the plain language of disability justice into a funding liability. Then it reads us honestly inside that weather. We publish our strengths to be useful and our weaknesses to be trusted.

We named what we steer by. Framing Documents gathers the nine papers we navigate by — Mission, Creed, Manifesto, Tenets, Covenant, Philosophy, Our Lens, Interdependence, and Choosing the Margin/Edges — each with a pulled description, and joins the Series index. A compass belongs in public: if these are the papers we navigate by, you should be able to read them and hold us to them. In the same spirit we published Why? — the plain answer to the first question anyone should ask. Default to open, all the way down to the reason.

We gave the site a second skin. Dark mode went live, carried by the Solarized system — one palette tuned to hold in light and dark alike. On the way we refactored the home page to cut page weight, DOM complexity, and load time. The site is an environment too, and we try to practice the environmental design we preach: let the reader choose their own light. The environment bends to the person, not the person to the environment.

The deck spread into the body of the site. Cavendish Cards landed on Projects (credited as a collaboration with Autistic Realms), Cavendish Space, Communication & Interaction Access, and the Livable Worlds Checklist — plus a “design brief, not a behavior report” section on Create a Neurodiversity Inclusive Environment, which earned a front-page doorway of its own. It’s the page we hand people who ask how to build neuroaffirming spaces.

And we named the hands that hold us up. The Supporters page had shrunk to a single line after our old Donor Wall couldn’t follow us to Givebutter. Rather than mourn the wall, we rebuilt the page as real appreciation — mutual aid and reciprocity, not top-down charity. Volunteers get their labor named and honored, not treated as free, and the widest ring — everyone who cites the glossary, shares a field guide, or forwards a newsletter — is recognized as support, because everything we publish is openly licensed. The missing wall became a feature: appreciation is collective by design.

We read the weather in the open and steered by papers anyone can check. We publish our strengths to be useful and our weaknesses to be trusted.

— Week 30 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 30 →

Week 31 — From the Map to the Directory: The Whole Building

The month ended by making the building easy to walk.

We drew the whole building, not just the door. The Orientation Map was only ever a “find the right door” page — a handful of starting points by need. The Site Directory is the building: all fourteen sections and every one of our hundreds of pages, nested the way the site is actually structured, as plain accessible lists — screen-reader friendly, no reliance on spatial layout — with a clickable visual tree at the top. The four largest collections are shown as hubs that link onward rather than dumped inline, because a flat list of everything is more overwhelm, not less.

Default to open means default to linkable. The House Style Guide had grown into one long page of stacked accordions, and the accordions were quietly breaking things — scrambling the table of contents, making it impossible to link to any single guide. A guide nobody can link to is a guide that can’t be cited, shared, or crosswalked. So we rebuilt it as a hub with subpages, and six companion guides stepped out with real, citable addresses: Writing Style, the Contributor Checklist, Scrollytelling, Neurodiversity-Friendly Content, Punctuation & Mechanics, and Why Sheets.

You choose how the words meet your eyes. Last month you got to choose your own light; this week, your own letters. Theme, font, and text size moved behind a single labelled “Aa Reading” trigger that opens a reading-preferences popover. There are eight fonts now — Montserrat, Atkinson Hyperlegible Next, Lexend, OpenDyslexic, Playpen Sans, Roboto, Noto Sans, and Literata, our first serif — each deferring to your own browser and OS settings rather than overriding them. Access isn’t one right setting; it’s the room to pick your own.

Findable by machines, too. A new FAQ page answers 18 questions answer-first — what Stimpunks is, how to request aid or a creator grant, licensing and reuse, volunteering, and our most-asked glossary terms — each linking back to its fuller page so the FAQ doubles as a topic-cluster hub. In the same pass we fixed the heading hierarchy to a single H1 per template and expanded the Organization structured data. Being legible to people and being legible to machines turn out to be the same discipline: say the plain thing, link it, and don’t hide it.

A welcome, not a warning. The new Terms of Use is plain-language and deliberately permissive. Instead of the usual lockdown-and-jargon, it affirmatively welcomes citing, quoting, embedding, translating, and remixing our work under CC BY-SA 4.0, while still covering the essentials in human language. A terms page can be a threshold you’re welcomed across instead of a gate that warns you off.

And the journey got a front door. We rewrote the opening scrollytelling passage from the ground up — new intros for all seven stops, from bringing our stims to the front through our umbrella to the reframe and the happy flappy stim-dance that ends it in motion — then built the hub it never had: The Reframer’s Journey: Surviving, Reframing, and Finding Our People, now the narrative entry point in Our Series that the analytical series build on. We also refreshed the Now page with Q3 OKRs drawn not from what we planned in April but from what Weeks 27–30 actually did. A Now page is only worth keeping if it stays honest.

We drew the whole building, not just the door, and gave every guide an address you can link to. We wrote a terms page that welcomes you across the threshold instead of warning you off it.

— Week 31 Changelog, Stimpunks Foundation

Read Week 31 →

🗺️ New to Stimpunks? Where to Start in July’s Work

July produced a lot. Here’s a guided path through it.

If you don’t know where to start:

→ Site Directory — the whole building

→ The Reframer’s Journey — the story first

→ FAQ — 18 answers, answer-first

If you support a child, a student, or a colleague:

→ Cavendish Cards — point instead of explain

→ Create a Neurodiversity Inclusive Environment

→ Threshold Anxiety — broken thresholds, not broken people

If you need to hear that you belong:

→ ★ stuff

→ Infodumplings: Otters Already Know How to Rest

→ Stimpunks Solidarity and Otters, by Helen at Autistic Realms

If you’re a funder, board member, or partner doing due diligence:

→ Reading the Weather: Our Strategic Environment

→ Framing Documents

→ Why?

If you’re thinking about AI and disability:

→ AI at Stimpunks — the front door

→ AI Ethics — Alignments and External Frameworks

→ Evaluating Relational AI Tools

If you want to know who we descend from:

→ Autism and Computing: The Root of Our Online Space

→ Inside the Tunnel: How to Sit Beside a Monotropic Learner

→ The Crosswalks section

If you want to reuse our work:

→ Terms of Use: A Welcome, Not a Warning

→ License

→ House Style Guide

🧭 Legible Systems, Opaque People

The most significant thing about July wasn’t a single publication. It was a distinction the month kept drawing without naming it outright.

We spent the month making things legible. The AI pages became a map. The site became a directory. The style guide became six citable addresses. Our strategic position became a published PESTEL and SWOT. Our values became an index of nine papers anyone can hold us to. Our terms became a welcome. Even our structured data got fixed, so the machines can read us too.

And in the same month, we published a word for the opposite: relational opacity — the right not to be fully decoded as the price of recognition.

That is not a contradiction. It’s the whole argument.

Institutions owe you transparency. You do not owe them decoding. Systems should be legible — their finances, their weaknesses, their reasoning, their reuse terms, their whole floor plan — because power that can’t be read can’t be held to account. People should get to choose. That’s why Cavendish Cards hands a child a picture instead of demanding a performance, and why the deck has no scores and isn’t a screening tool. It’s why the reading panel offers eight fonts and two lights instead of one correct setting. It’s why a communicative breakdown in a classroom is an ecological misalignment in the room, not a deficit inside the Autistic person. Legibility on your own terms is the point, and not a side effect.

The month’s rest week made the same case from the other direction. Fungi work in the quiet and the dark. The otters drift together and drift apart, and nobody makes them explain it. Rest is the work, and being unobserved is part of what makes it possible.

Broken systems, not broken people. Broken thresholds, not broken people. Default to open — about ourselves, first and hardest — and leave people the room to stay unread.

Receipts: Working in Public

We default to open whenever we can.

🔭 What We’re Doing Next

Our Q3 2026 objectives are drawn from what Weeks 27–31 actually did, not from what we planned in April.

🃏 The Two New Front Doors

  • Grow Cavendish Cards — artwork in progress, with the guardrails intact: the person controls sharing, no scoring, not a screening tool, never a replacement for AAC. It’s CC0 and community-authored — add a card.
  • Keep building out ★ stuff — more zines, more field guides, the same one line underneath. Belonging is constitutive, not conferred.

🤖 AI Ethics and the Crosswalk Program

📋 Accountability in Public

🤝 Mutual Aid and Partners

💸 Funding & Sustainability

  • Build slow and steady toward sustainability, documented through Impact and the design method
  • Expand recurring and employer-matched support through Give

We are building the infrastructure we wish existed. If this work matters to you, help fund it, partner with us, or share the tools with someone who needs them.

One Good Line

We publish our strengths to be useful and our weaknesses to be trusted.

Reading the Weather: Our Strategic Environment – Stimpunks Foundation

📚 Three Things Worth Revisiting

In case you missed them — or they’re newly relevant:

  • Cavendish Cards — the CC0 deck where a child points at a card instead of performing an account of their needs. Lay cave, buzzy, headphones and you’ve been handed a design brief, not a behavior report. Hand this to any teacher, parent, or support worker who has ever asked a kid to “use your words.”
  • Reading the Weather: Our Strategic Environment — the PESTEL and SWOT we published instead of filing. Share this with anyone who wants to know what a nonprofit looks like when it stops managing its image. We publish our strengths to be useful and our weaknesses to be trusted.
  • ★ stuff — every atom heavier than hydrogen was forged inside a star, which means belonging was never something anyone had to confer on you. Send this to the person who needs it. You were star stuff all along. 💫

How You Can Help This Month

Need help?

Support the work

Share

Stimpunks Foundation · stimpunks.org · Mutual Aid and Human-Centered Learning for Neurodivergent and Disabled People

Changelog · Now · Donate · Get Help

Posted

in

,

by

Ryan Boren

Tags:

,

Discover more from Stimpunks Foundation

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading