The moment: you are going into an access conversation.
A catalogue rather than an argument, made to be carried in to a manager, to HR, or to anyone adjusting a shared space. The five external senses on the face; the three internal ones — proprioception, vestibular, interoception — on the reverse, where they get the room. Senses without folk names get argued down as preferences, so they are named. Adapted from the Sensory Access at Work Why Sheet.
Side A of B
Sensory Access
at Work
Most workplaces are built for one narrow way of sensing, moving and communicating, and anything outside it gets called a problem. Input stacks faster than it can clear — and that load gets read as fragility rather than as design failure.
Access is created,
not granted.
the environment is designed · so it can be redesigned
- Dim or kill the overheads; task lighting and daylight instead.
- Replace or filter flickering fluorescents.
- Sunglasses, caps and screen dimming are equipment, not accessories.
- Quiet zones and low-stimulation rooms that actually exist.
- Noise-cancelling headphones and ear protection as normal kit.
- Cut background noise: HVAC, machinery, open-plan chatter.
- No scented cleaners, air fresheners or aerosols in shared areas.
- Ask people not to wear strong perfume or cologne.
- Warn before painting, deep cleaning, or anything with fumes.
- No shared meals or team lunches as a condition of taking part.
- Safe foods and familiar brands, without comment or pressure.
- A private, low-stimulation place to eat.
- Ask before contact. Don’t assume handshakes.
- Sensory-friendly clothing over rigid dress codes; fidgets and weighted lap pads.
- Thermal sensitivity is common — layers, a personal fan, some say over the thermostat.
- You were taught five senses. There are at least eight.
- The other three have no folk names, so needs that come from them get argued down as preferences.
stimpunks.org/why/sensory-access-at-work
free to print, copy, change and share · CC0 1.0
reverse
Side B of B
- Allow movement: standing, walking, rocking, pacing, a sit-stand desk.
- Walking meetings and movement breaks.
- Unusual posture is not inattention and not disrespect.
- Stable, supportive seating, and freedom to change position.
- No high stools or unstable chairs.
- Warning about anything that moves, spins or shifts underfoot.
- Build breaks in. Don’t rely on people noticing hunger, thirst or fatigue on time.
- Normalise stepping away to eat, drink, or rest.
- Ask directly rather than waiting to be told. Answering may itself be hard.
- Communication — written and asynchronous as normal and respected; processing time; AAC and text over voice.
- Attention — protect deep-work time. Monotropic attention runs single and deep, and resents being fragmented.
- Predictability — agendas and questions in advance, realistic notice of change.
- Meetings — materials ahead, cameras optional, written contributions counted.
- Recovery — rest and pacing are part of sustainable work. Sensory load plus masking pressure compounds into burnout.
Bring it to a manager, to HR, or to an access conversation as a starting point. Pick the entries that fit you — nobody needs every item. It is a menu, not a test.
- not a diagnosis, and not a medical form
- not a fixed checklist every person must match
- not a claim that difference is deficit
- not a demand to “just try harder” once the environment has been named
Your nervous system is real, and the environment is designed. This is access as infrastructure, not an afterthought.
Stimpunks Foundationfree to print, copy, change and share — no permission needed
CC0 1.0 · no rights reserved
Foundation
One sheet · print double-sided · bring it to the conversation · share freely
