Pathology lite complements the now well-known concept of neurodiversity lite. It highlights equally risky ways that scientific discourse and practice can subtly reinforce harm against neurodivergent people, often without being described as such.
In the emerging field of critical neurodiversity studies (Ashley, Creechan, and Jones, n. d.; Bergenmar, Creechan, and Stenning 2025; ND Hums Network, n. d.), the phrase ‘neurodiversity lite’ has been used to describe rhetorical practices of assimilation and neutralisation of the neurodiversity lexicon (and of its critical and subversive potentials) by mainstream actors in psychological, economic, or institutional spheres (Neumeier 2018).
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed